CO129-376 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [3-4] — Page 523

that an

auch differentiation would be

absurd.

quite al

? Ach &

say

that he will have

least from our desp of 36th March that

1

approve

the Sf So unable baffrone of Mr It's & affrintant as D.S.AP.

State

that the decision to remove the

Y

parts of A.S.JP. & D.S.JP from the

cadet classific

affey

was meant

f all Cadets ice for reasons mentioned in par 5 of

3155 Manh

desk I

the

*

that

magrevande

on the part coche put forward this

decision molves

Cadets since they

that no

no hardship to

were

flainly told on offtant

quarantee would be

that the numbers & salanes would remain unaltered.

hur Cruis

H.

gwen

Rufenor

Rth 26/5.

In frost fen

Courrsation

Sir 7's memon is at fault. It is true that Si It. may did express the views ascribed this in with the Gov. & myself, but I at once disputed it, referring him to the warning given to all Caleti, to which hit Wisemand alludes. He and repling that he afraid

this Cadets medn't like

3 obeno that the intersti

ઝ

Sthe

Vide orand

مستعمل

of the public service must came of the subject Isspped.

510

first-

I am cauinced that there can

to nothing worse

than

icer it fficer

for

a Police Force

Cadeti who

this work

take little interest to

regarding Police jobs merch

skipping-stones in their caroor.

rw

of the force is the will

efficient it must the

Vicens Sticent

W

who have to

make their career in it.

hur Wiseen

? Repl purposes, laring stress an point

[ I cannot spare

So

awwx

para>]

Om

རི

this

an 3625

desp copy of the relevant.

I think m. shid also demur tthe last words

the disp. Cadets murs.

not only as not having preferential claim (a vay dangirmes phrase in my opinion)

to regarded not only

to the C.S. P.s not having any

in

F

post claim They

art